![]() ![]() These results together with some previously known statistical features of the Voynich manuscript, give support to the presence of a genuine message inside the book.” ![]() We are also able to extract some of the most significant semantic word-networks in the text. Quote 1: “We show that the Voynich manuscript presents a complex organization in the distribution of words that is compatible with those found in real language sequences. In summary, this paper is at best inaccurate, and at worst likely to cause needless further confusion in a field that’s already complex by anyone’s standards.įirst, some quotes from the article that show what the authors are claiming, in their own words. In addition, the M&Z results are also consistent with very different interpretations from the one that they reach. This assertion is sort-of true, but is seriously incomplete it doesn’t mention the substantial literature discussing the problems with the “unidentified language” hypothesis, which have led most serious researchers to view this hypothesis as untenable. my article on textual structures in the Voynich Manuscript).Īssertion 3: T heir results are consistent with the presence of meaningful text within the manuscript. There’s plenty of published material showing that a hoax could easily produce just the sort of findings that they report, and more, from the level of syllable distributions to the level of regularities between and within sections of the entire manuscript (e.g. My article about textual structures in the Voynich Manuscript deals with precisely this point, for example.Īssertion 2: T he statistical patterns they have found cannot be explained as the result of a hoax. This topic has received less attention, but it has been previously addressed. The authors focus in particular on statistical patterns that extend across sections of the manuscript. As far as I know, all the serious researchers in the Voynich community take this as a well-established starting point. There’s a substantial amount of previous research which has reported similar results. This assertion is true, but it’s hardly news. In brief, the article consists of three key assertions, all of which are seriously flawed.Īssertion 1: T hey have found statistical patterns in the Voynich Manuscript which are similar to the statistical patterns of real languages. It also addresses some unfortunate omissions in the Montemurro & Zanette (M&Z) article. This article is a detailed discussion of some of these misunderstandings and their implications. Unfortunately, the authors appear to have misunderstood some key issues. The authors claim to have produced evidence for the presence of real, meaningful text within the Voynich Manuscript. Zanette, on PloS One: Keywords and co-occurrence patterns in the Voynich manuscript: an information-theoretic analysis. There’s a new article about the Voynich Manuscript, by Marcelo A.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |